P
Psych-Fit
Back to candidates

Field Sales Executive · Acme Engineering Ltd

Conor Walsh

conor.walsh@example.ie · 6 yrs experience · expects €57,000 · submitted recently

View shortlist

Overall Fit Score

0

Good fit for this role

Work-style alignment

76

Motivation fit

91

Work-Style Alignment (40%)76
Motivation Alignment (20%)91
Cognitive Assessment (20%)69
Skills Match (15%)40
Experience Match (5%)100

Why this score?

Plain-English summary of the five contributing signals.

  • Work-Style Alignment

    Solid alignment, particularly around innovation and collaboration.

    76%
    Strong
  • Motivation Alignment

    Candidate's intrinsic motivators — relatedness and competence — closely match what this role offers.

    91%
    Excellent
  • Cognitive Assessment

    Reasoning score is mid-range — pair with a role-relevant task in interview for a fuller picture.

    69%
    Good
  • Skills Match

    Covers 2 of 5 core requirements — consider whether the gaps are learnable or blockers.

    40%
    Moderate
  • Experience Match

    Comfortably exceeds the 2-year minimum (6 years total).

    100%
    Excellent

Key strengths

Where Conor naturally aligns

  • Innovation Fit

    Close match

    Within 7 points of what the role calls for.

  • Collaboration Fit

    Close match

    Within 10 points of what the role calls for.

  • Autonomy Fit

    Close match

    Within 15 points of what the role calls for.

Areas worth exploring

Where the role differs

  • Influence Fit

    Above role profile

    39 points from the role's profile — worth a conversation, not a rejection.

  • Customer Interaction Fit

    Above role profile

    32 points from the role's profile — worth a conversation, not a rejection.

  • Communication Style Fit

    Above role profile

    32 points from the role's profile — worth a conversation, not a rejection.

Recommended interview topics

What to probe at interview

Generated from the largest differences between Conor and the role's DNA — ask every candidate the same structured questions.

  1. 1

    Influence Fit

    Ask how they influence without authority when the room disagrees.

  2. 2

    Customer Interaction Fit

    Ask how they manage the volume of customer contact this role carries.

  3. 3

    Communication Style Fit

    Ask how they adapt their communication for quieter stakeholders.

Alignment Indicators

A supportive snapshot of mutual fit — not a score or ranking.

Innovation Fit
Strong
Collaboration Fit
High
Autonomy Fit
High
Influence Fit
Emerging
Customer Interaction Fit
Moderate
Motivation Alignment
Moderate

Work-Style Alignment

Your assessment shows clear alignment with this role's working style, with only a small number of areas the role would ask something different of you.

Where you naturally align

  • You align with building things from scratch.
  • You align with collaborative environments.
  • You align with autonomy.

Where the role differs

  • More influencing and persuasion than you naturally prefer.

This role also requires skills or experience that weren't demonstrated in your application. Developing these areas could improve your alignment with similar opportunities in the future.

Pace Alignment

This role moves quickly — a chance to stretch your pace if you enjoy variety.

Motivation Alignment (SDT)

Motivation differences

  • This role leans more on independent decision-making than your responses indicate motivates you.
Autonomy62
Competence66
Relatedness74

Potential Growth Areas

This role may involve persuading and driving decisions and customer-facing settings.

persuading and driving decisions
customer-facing settings
communication-rich work

Work-Style Alignment

How this candidate's preferences map to the role's behavioural DNA.

Skills Match

New business development
Consultative selling
Pipeline management
CRM (Salesforce)
Negotiation

Big Five trait profile

Openness48
Conscientiousness70
Extraversion66
Agreeableness72
Emotional stability62

The hiring decision

Two finalists, one structured process

Both finalists were interviewed on the same recommended topics, so the conversations compared like with like. Conor was offered the role — not on a gut call, but on an evidence trail the whole panel could see: work-style alignment with the role's behavioural DNA, motivation needs the team can genuinely meet, and cognitive, skills and experience signals scored consistently for every applicant.

Same questions for every finalist
Decision evidence retained
Offer accepted