P
Psych-Fit
Back to candidates

Maintenance Engineer · Acme Engineering Ltd

Katie Ryan

katie.ryan@example.ie · 4 yrs experience · expects €54,000 · submitted recently

View shortlist

Overall Fit Score

0

Strong fit for this role

Work-style alignment

82

Motivation fit

96

Work-Style Alignment (40%)82
Motivation Alignment (20%)96
Cognitive Assessment (20%)83
Skills Match (15%)60
Experience Match (5%)100

Why this score?

Plain-English summary of the five contributing signals.

  • Work-Style Alignment

    Solid alignment, particularly around communication preference and collaboration.

    82%
    Strong
  • Motivation Alignment

    Candidate's intrinsic motivators — relatedness and competence — closely match what this role offers.

    96%
    Excellent
  • Cognitive Assessment

    Solid reasoning ability, in the expected range for the role.

    83%
    Strong
  • Skills Match

    Covers 3 of 5 core requirements — some gaps that may need onboarding support.

    60%
    Good
  • Experience Match

    Meets the requested minimum of 4 years (4 years total).

    100%
    Excellent

Key strengths

Where Katie naturally aligns

  • Communication Style Fit

    Close match

    Within 2 points of what the role calls for.

  • Collaboration Fit

    Close match

    Within 3 points of what the role calls for.

  • Work Pace Fit

    Close match

    Within 8 points of what the role calls for.

Areas worth exploring

Where the role differs

  • Customer Interaction Fit

    Below role profile

    38 points from the role's profile — worth a conversation, not a rejection.

  • Ambiguity Tolerance Fit

    Below role profile

    27 points from the role's profile — worth a conversation, not a rejection.

  • Innovation Fit

    Below role profile

    26 points from the role's profile — worth a conversation, not a rejection.

Recommended interview topics

What to probe at interview

Generated from the largest differences between Katie and the role's DNA — ask every candidate the same structured questions.

  1. 1

    Customer Interaction Fit

    Explore their comfort with sustained, direct customer ownership.

  2. 2

    Ambiguity Tolerance Fit

    Explore how they act when the problem isn't yet clearly defined.

  3. 3

    Innovation Fit

    Explore their appetite for improving a process rather than following it.

Alignment Indicators

A supportive snapshot of mutual fit — not a score or ranking.

Communication Style Fit
Strong
Collaboration Fit
Strong
Work Pace Fit
Strong
Customer Interaction Fit
Emerging
Ambiguity Tolerance Fit
Moderate
Motivation Alignment
Strong

Work-Style Alignment

Your assessment shows clear alignment with this role's working style, with only a small number of areas the role would ask something different of you.

Where you naturally align

  • You align with communication-rich work.
  • You align with collaborative environments.
  • You align with fast-moving environments with changing priorities.

Where the role differs

  • Less customer-facing work than your assessment leans toward.

Pace Alignment

You may perform well in fast-moving environments with changing priorities.

Motivation Alignment (SDT)

Your strongest driver is competence — this role's motivation DNA emphasises competence.

Autonomy60
Competence84
Relatedness58

Potential Growth Areas

This role may involve clear processes and structure.

clear processes and structure

Work-Style Alignment

How this candidate's preferences map to the role's behavioural DNA.

Skills Match

Preventive maintenance
PLC diagnostics
Hydraulics
Health & safety
Root cause analysis

Big Five trait profile

Openness58
Conscientiousness76
Extraversion52
Agreeableness68
Emotional stability66

The hiring decision

Two finalists, one structured process

Both finalists were interviewed on the same recommended topics, so the conversations compared like with like. Katie was offered the role — not on a gut call, but on an evidence trail the whole panel could see: work-style alignment with the role's behavioural DNA, motivation needs the team can genuinely meet, and cognitive, skills and experience signals scored consistently for every applicant.

Same questions for every finalist
Decision evidence retained
Offer accepted