P
Psych-Fit
Back to candidates

Field Sales Executive · Acme Engineering Ltd

Lucy Sheridan

lucy.sheridan@example.ie · 3 yrs experience · expects €50,000 · submitted recently

View shortlist

Overall Fit Score

0

Strong fit for this role

Work-style alignment

83

Motivation fit

97

Work-Style Alignment (40%)83
Motivation Alignment (20%)97
Cognitive Assessment (20%)81
Skills Match (15%)60
Experience Match (5%)100

Why this score?

Plain-English summary of the five contributing signals.

  • Work-Style Alignment

    Solid alignment, particularly around autonomy and collaboration.

    83%
    Strong
  • Motivation Alignment

    Candidate's intrinsic motivators — autonomy and relatedness — closely match what this role offers.

    97%
    Excellent
  • Cognitive Assessment

    Solid reasoning ability, in the expected range for the role.

    81%
    Strong
  • Skills Match

    Covers 3 of 5 core requirements — some gaps that may need onboarding support.

    60%
    Good
  • Experience Match

    Meets the requested minimum of 2 years (3 years total).

    100%
    Excellent

Key strengths

Where Lucy naturally aligns

  • Autonomy Fit

    Close match

    Within 9 points of what the role calls for.

  • Collaboration Fit

    Close match

    Within 13 points of what the role calls for.

  • Innovation Fit

    Close match

    Within 15 points of what the role calls for.

Areas worth exploring

Where the role differs

  • Structure Fit

    Below role profile

    23 points from the role's profile — worth a conversation, not a rejection.

  • Customer Interaction Fit

    Above role profile

    23 points from the role's profile — worth a conversation, not a rejection.

  • Influence Fit

    Above role profile

    20 points from the role's profile — worth a conversation, not a rejection.

Recommended interview topics

What to probe at interview

Generated from the largest differences between Lucy and the role's DNA — ask every candidate the same structured questions.

  1. 1

    Structure Fit

    Explore how they work inside defined processes and reporting rhythms.

  2. 2

    Customer Interaction Fit

    Ask how they manage the volume of customer contact this role carries.

  3. 3

    Influence Fit

    Ask how they influence without authority when the room disagrees.

Alignment Indicators

A supportive snapshot of mutual fit — not a score or ranking.

Autonomy Fit
Strong
Collaboration Fit
High
Innovation Fit
High
Structure Fit
Moderate
Customer Interaction Fit
Moderate
Motivation Alignment
Strong

Work-Style Alignment

Your assessment shows clear alignment with this role's working style, with only a small number of areas the role would ask something different of you.

Where you naturally align

  • You align with autonomy.
  • You align with collaborative environments.
  • You align with building things from scratch.

Where the role differs

  • Less structure and more open-ended work than you tend toward.

Pace Alignment

You may perform well in fast-moving environments with changing priorities.

Motivation Alignment (SDT)

Your strongest driver is autonomy — this role's motivation DNA emphasises autonomy.

Autonomy84
Competence74
Relatedness72

Potential Growth Areas

This role may involve customer-facing settings and persuading and driving decisions.

customer-facing settings
persuading and driving decisions

Work-Style Alignment

How this candidate's preferences map to the role's behavioural DNA.

Skills Match

New business development
Consultative selling
Pipeline management
CRM (Salesforce)
Negotiation

Big Five trait profile

Openness70
Conscientiousness60
Extraversion86
Agreeableness64
Emotional stability70

The hiring decision

Two finalists, one structured process

Both finalists were interviewed on the same recommended topics, so the conversations compared like with like. Lucy was offered the role — not on a gut call, but on an evidence trail the whole panel could see: work-style alignment with the role's behavioural DNA, motivation needs the team can genuinely meet, and cognitive, skills and experience signals scored consistently for every applicant.

Same questions for every finalist
Decision evidence retained
Offer accepted