P
Psych-Fit
Back to candidates

Maintenance Engineer · Acme Engineering Ltd

Marek Kowalski

marek.kowalski@example.ie · 9 yrs experience · expects €63,000 · submitted recently

View shortlist

Overall Fit Score

0

Strong fit for this role

Work-style alignment

85

Motivation fit

96

Work-Style Alignment (40%)85
Motivation Alignment (20%)96
Cognitive Assessment (20%)72
Skills Match (15%)60
Experience Match (5%)100

Why this score?

Plain-English summary of the five contributing signals.

  • Work-Style Alignment

    Strong alignment with the role's preferred pace, autonomy and innovation profile.

    85%
    Strong
  • Motivation Alignment

    Candidate's intrinsic motivators — competence and autonomy — closely match what this role offers.

    96%
    Excellent
  • Cognitive Assessment

    Solid reasoning ability, in the expected range for the role.

    72%
    Good
  • Skills Match

    Covers 3 of 5 core requirements — some gaps that may need onboarding support.

    60%
    Good
  • Experience Match

    Comfortably exceeds the 4-year minimum (9 years total).

    100%
    Excellent

Key strengths

Where Marek naturally aligns

  • Work Pace Fit

    Close match

    Within 9 points of what the role calls for.

  • Autonomy Fit

    Close match

    Within 9 points of what the role calls for.

  • Innovation Fit

    Close match

    Within 11 points of what the role calls for.

Areas worth exploring

Where the role differs

  • Customer Interaction Fit

    Below role profile

    29 points from the role's profile — worth a conversation, not a rejection.

  • Ambiguity Tolerance Fit

    Below role profile

    22 points from the role's profile — worth a conversation, not a rejection.

  • Influence Fit

    Below role profile

    16 points from the role's profile — worth a conversation, not a rejection.

Recommended interview topics

What to probe at interview

Generated from the largest differences between Marek and the role's DNA — ask every candidate the same structured questions.

  1. 1

    Customer Interaction Fit

    Explore their comfort with sustained, direct customer ownership.

  2. 2

    Ambiguity Tolerance Fit

    Explore how they act when the problem isn't yet clearly defined.

  3. 3

    Influence Fit

    Explore how they push back on a customer or an internal stakeholder.

Alignment Indicators

A supportive snapshot of mutual fit — not a score or ranking.

Work Pace Fit
Strong
Autonomy Fit
Strong
Innovation Fit
High
Customer Interaction Fit
Moderate
Ambiguity Tolerance Fit
Moderate
Motivation Alignment
Strong

Work-Style Alignment

Your assessment shows clear alignment with this role's working style, with only a small number of areas the role would ask something different of you.

Where you naturally align

  • You align with fast-moving environments with changing priorities.
  • You align with autonomy.
  • You align with established, refined ways of working.

Where the role differs

  • Less customer-facing work than your assessment leans toward.

Pace Alignment

You may perform well in fast-moving environments with changing priorities.

Motivation Alignment (SDT)

Your strongest driver is competence — this role's motivation DNA emphasises competence.

Autonomy52
Competence78
Relatedness48

Potential Growth Areas

This role has some differences from your profile that are worth exploring in conversation.

Work-Style Alignment

How this candidate's preferences map to the role's behavioural DNA.

Skills Match

Preventive maintenance
PLC diagnostics
Hydraulics
Health & safety
Root cause analysis

Big Five trait profile

Openness40
Conscientiousness84
Extraversion42
Agreeableness60
Emotional stability74

The hiring decision

Two finalists, one structured process

Both finalists were interviewed on the same recommended topics, so the conversations compared like with like. Marek was offered the role — not on a gut call, but on an evidence trail the whole panel could see: work-style alignment with the role's behavioural DNA, motivation needs the team can genuinely meet, and cognitive, skills and experience signals scored consistently for every applicant.

Same questions for every finalist
Decision evidence retained
Offer accepted